Tag Archives: ALSA

/** */

Reddit AMA Guest Appearance

Reddit Tag-Along


On Friday, November 18, 2016, I participated in a Reddit AMA as a co-guest in support of my friend, Jef Akst. Earlier this year she published a book titled Personal Trials: How Terminally Ill ALS Patients Took Medical Treatment Into Their Own Hands (available on amazon.com in both Kindle and paperback) about the Oral Sodium Chlorite Project I created along with Rob Tison and Ben Harris, and our journey through the DIY drug experience. Reddit asked her to do an AMA about the book and she asked me to tag along for the session to give the ALS patient perspective and as one of the subjects of the book.

It was my first time ever doing this and it was exhilarating. For two hours, Jef and I were furiously typing away trying to keep up with the deluge of questions. In fact, I am still going back and answering late questions right now. At first I was a little nervous about facing a bunch of trolls and kooks, as the Internet appears full of these days. But the questions were all quality and reflected a desire to actually learn something about the subject.

I am grateful to Jef for writing the book, telling the story of patients driven to find their own solutions to untreatable diseases. And I am extremely grateful to Reddit for giving us this opportunity to share a taste of the experience with others who may have never previously heard of ALS before today. And thank you again, Jef, for inviting me to help her tell the story.

/** */


My readers know that I have serious differences with the ALS Association (ALSA). However, my promise to deliver the truth (though bathed in hope in the delivery) cuts both ways. When something good happens, no matter who is behind it, I must give kudos to the deserving.

The 2014 social media phenomenon known as the Ice Bucket Challenge marked a seminal moment in the history of public awareness of ALS and in funding for research. Since then, PALS have been demanding that ALSA actually use that money rather than sitting on it. It now appears that ALSA is finally indeed mobilizing a little of that money (about $3M or 2.5%) on two wise and popular targets. This is good news, although there is a slight catch…

ALSA is helping fund a Phase 3 of the Cytokinetics drug tirasemtiv and a Phase 2B of Neuraltus’ drug NP001. Tirasemtiv is a muscular activator, meaning it causes the muscles to react more strongly than normal to a neural input. Tirasemtiv does nothing to halt the death of the motor neurons, but it can let PALS have more independence for longer than without it. NP001 is a highly purified and pH-balanced form of sodium chlorite that reverts the chronic inflammatory attack on the neurons back to a pro-growth state. Some of you might remember our dear departed friends Rob Tison and Ben Harris who experienced remarkable results during the Phase 2A. Now we know why: Based on inflammatory biomarkers discovered in post-hoc analysis, Neuraltus believes it has found a responder subgroup and is restricting the Phase 2B to those patients. I expect very good news from the 2B.

[UPDATE (07-13-2015) From my friend Jenica Lancy at ALSA GoldenWest: Today, The ALS Association announced its support of 58 new research grants totaling $11,621,638 to find treatments and a cure for ALS. The research awards announced today include investigator-initiated grants, drug development contracts, Milton Safenowitz Postdoctoral Fellowships and support of the NEALS/TREAT ALS™ Clinical Trials Network. You can see a full list of the grants here.]

Now for the catch: What ALSA is really doing is funding operations at one of the clinics which promote and direct funding toward ALSA. Both trials will be conducted by that clinic (the excellent Forbes-Norris ALS Clinic in San Francisco).

However, the fact remains that ALSA is supporting two very promising clinical trials. Some of us might wish they would do more, sooner, but they are moving in the right direction. I believe the proper response should be “Thanks! Keep it up!”. Let’s all applaud ALSA and encourage further progress along this path.

/** */

Hope Now for ALS

There has been a lot of recent controversy surrounding the experimental treatment in clinical trials known as GM604. A lot of misinformation has been tossed around on both sides of the issue. I want to beg your attention for a little while to explain what’s really going on.

First, as many of you know, I was the single late-stage PALS who received GM6 in compassionate use. The intent behind this was to get a look at differences in biomarker candidate levels between earlier-stage and late-stage PALS. Any outward physical manifestation of improved condition noticed would be a bonus and, due to my advanced condition, no improvement in condition was expected. Nevertheless, Genervon and I came up with the idea to try to chart improvements in the tongue. The rationale is that since my tongue is only moderately affected, and because the hypoglossal nerve contains one of the shortest motor neurons in the body, any possible improvement would be noticed there first.

Because of my growing cooperative relationship with Genervon dating back to my first blog post on GM6, I was granted the only Expanded Access outside of trial. They were interested in getting a look at GM6 behavior in late-stage PALS and I had proven to them my organizational skills in preparing my own medical surveillance team and in communications by preparing the mechanism for data capture. Even a single Expanded Access Program can be a burden on such a small company not optimized for such work. My knowledge and experience gained over the past few years was of considerable help in filling out and transmitting (and following up on) my own paperwork.

Thousands of single Expanded Access requests would be overly burdensome and even if Genervon enlisted the help of the ALS Emergency Treatment Fund, the maximum number of patients who would be able to participate would be measured in the few hundreds. Not only would patients have to pay for drug but would also have to pay for their own medical surveillance team and at least one hospital visit for the first infusion (this alone represents several thousand dollars). If you are required to give biological samples, the cost tops $10,000.

Genervon shared with me much of the top-level data from the Phase 2 to compare against my own data. Even though the trial population was small, the data were stronger in separation between treatment/placebo cohorts than in any legitimate trial results I had seen before. And GM6 was demonstrated safe over a much larger group spread over three different neurological diseases (including ALS) plus a healthy safety group. For these reasons I suggested to and worked with Genervon on applying for the FDA Accelerated Approval Program in order to get GM6 to all PALS paid for by insurance and Medicare.

And thus began the shitstorm…

Researchers, neurologists, and leaders of certain advocacy organizations who believe in the FDA’s 60 year old regulatory formula – comprised of designing, completing, and analyzing Phase 1, 2, 3 trials over a period of 5-15 years – are failing in their proclaimed mission. They simply have to stop regarding patients as helpless victims willing to eat rat poison if someone said it cured ALS, Genervon as somehow the 19th Century snake oil salesman, and themselves as the White Knight riding to our rescue. The very process of obtaining an experimental drug requires a lot of medical oversight, which we appreciate and rely on. However, patients are intelligent adults whose only desire is to change the status quo of scientific research for the benefit of both the current and future generations of PALS.

The 1992 FDA Accelerated Approval Program (AAP) was designed to meet the needs of patient populations where there is an urgent and unmet need. In 2012, Congress passed and the President signed into law the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA), strengthening the agency’s ability to advance public health by equipping the FDA with tools intended to expedite the development and review of innovative new medicines that address certain unmet medical needs. Among the objectives, Title IX expanded the scope of products that qualify for accelerated approval. Specific language in this law states that the FDA is to incorporate novel approaches to the review of surrogate endpoints based on pathophysiologic and pharmacologic evidence in such guidance, especially in instances where the low prevalence of a disease renders the existence or collection of other types of data unlikely or impractical. It is obvious that Congress and the President had in mind diseases just like ALS when passing and signing FDASIA into law, yet the FDA has done very little to incorporate these guidelines.

With Congress now discussing the 21st Century Cures Act, we at Hope Now for ALS believe that we are on the right side of history by insisting that PALS are given opportunities to access new investigational treatments through the FDA’s Accelerated Approval Program which, with its requirement for post-marketing Phase 4 data surveillance to confirm efficacy and safety, will continue to provide invaluable data on new treatments for ALS. As most patients are ineligible for standard clinical trials, this is our only option to contribute to research that will provide the same data at a faster rate among a larger population of patients – providing much needed data on subsets of the patient population. The Phase 4 requirements of Accelerated Approval also have the ability to save billions of dollars in research that is better spent developing more new and better investigational treatments for a myriad of neurological conditions.

I will grant that the biomarker candidates are new and not yet “proven”, but FDA did allow them as endpoints in the Phase 2. They are not brand-new fabrications by Genervon and are backed by a lot of recent research by respected researchers. And they were all quite uniform in response to GM6 while the placebo group all continued in the abnormal direction. In my n=1 case report the biomarker candidates sometimes went in the reverse direction, but ALWAYS TOWARD NORMAL LEVELS. This is a great indication that GM6 promotes neuronal homeostasis – the holy grail for ALS research.

The Phase 2 was indeed also only a very small population, and in previous ALS trials of similar size it was impossible to collect reliable efficacy data in such a small cohort. However, this trial was very different from previous trials. The effect registered was much larger than in previous such trials (especially dexpramipexole) and was backed up by multiple secondary measurements not subject to any placebo effect. The combination of surprisingly-large effect size and objective biological markers sets this aside from previous trials (which also used the ALSFRS almost exclusively). There was an erroneous though well-intentioned attempt to use the released FVC information as evidence of poor trial design. However, the comparison used a very inappropriate analogy population and was built on an assumption based on incorrect data.

I do have serious issues with a point used in arguments against GM6: The lithium debacle. The media reports which came out obviously created a lot of excitement within the patient community. Our first reaction was asking and pleading the research community to quickly follow up with more trials to confirm that study and the response from the research committee was absolute disinterest. Therefore the patient community took it upon themselves to create a verification study, which we did. We did *NOT* merely go out and start using lithium off-label. In fact, it was only after our trial data was being released that the research community decided to do a confirmation study. By then we had already demonstrated that lithium had no effect in ALS and begged the research community to not waste time and millions of dollars.

But again, the research community ignored the patient community.

The Hope Now for ALS movement isn’t for GM6 to skip the regulatory process. It’s to get FDA to use its existing programs and Congressional mandate to provide potentially life-saving treatment to PALS. This is especially important now that truly-effective treatments are very near (including NP001, Neurown, etc.). Caution is obviously warranted but ALS is a race against a clock that doesn’t care. More aggressive strategy is thus required which necessitates a little less caution and a lot more courage.

In summary, the facts are:

  • Genervon asked FDA for Accelerated Approval at the post-Phase 2 meeting where they presented the complete trial data plus the case report for my Compassionate Use project. I know this to be true because I co-wrote the cover letter to the data package and it specifically asked for Accelerated Approval (and it was me who urged Genervon to pursue AAP).
  • The FDA should have responded with specific instructions on how to file. They did not and thus we were all left in a state of confusion. Then FDA took the unusual step of calling on Genervon to publicly release proprietary data. Genervon has no duty to do so and FDA has no authority to make such a request.
  • Genervon has perfectly complied with law and regulation. All they want is to help and they believe GM6 can do that. The data so far looks good (and I can say that, having actually seen it where all others commenting otherwise have not). It’s not a slam-dunk, but it’s positive and safe enough that I think all PALS should have access to it – not just those eligible for clinical trial.
  • The FDA Accelerated Approval Program, in place since 1992 to deal with fatal diseases for which no other treatments exist, is the best way to save lives. It opens access WHILE CLINICAL TRIALS STILL CONTINUE. It’s used for cancer and other diseases with less-severe prognosis. Why not ALS?
  • GM6 has a perfect safety record in over 50 patients across 3 separate neurological conditions plus a healthy initial safety cohort.
  • This is about patients deciding for themselves what risk to take in treatment. This is NOT about a company trying to avoid the clinical trial process or enrich itself on patients desperation. The AAP is an existing program which gives patients access to potentially life-saving treatment while collecting the valuable efficacy data.
  • Contrast Genervon’s completely legal and transparent actions to other companies marketing unproven products such as lunasin and aimspro directly to patients using email. Those companies use slick pitches with “proof” based purely on non-accepted metrics and anecdotes.
  • The movement behind GM6 is entirely grassroots.

The above are facts. All of the “expert opinion” going around is just biased speculation.

/** */

Scuttle Rebuttal

I am a little peeved at a new attack on the push for FDA’s Accelerated Approval Program for the ALS treatment called GM6 (known as GM604 in clinical trials). This attack basically follows the same line as the one from the ALS Association (and in fact incorporated it by reference). Both are sloppy and disingenuous in style and content. They attempt false comparison to other previously-failed trials without including the reasons for those previous failures and they also try a very clumsy smear by comparison to an act of intentional clinical fraud. I am disappointed that such comparisons are presented to a public looking for facts as well as hope.

First let me discuss the false comparison to previous trial:

  1. The comparisons are false primarily because the old trials exclusively used the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS) which is a horrible metric by even the most generous interpretation. This is the only way a call for large trials can be justified, because the numb insensitivity of the ALSFRS (even the Revised version) requires such to make any kind of meaningful conclusion in a heterogeneous disease like ALS. However, the GM6 trial used several biomarker candidates and other objective clinical measurements as surrogate end-points (keep that phrase in mind) which correlated which the subjective end-points such as the ALSFRS-R. The biomarkers used were suggested and evaluated by Dr. Robert Bowser, a 2015 winner of the Sheila Essey Award for significant research contributions to fighting ALS.
  2. Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), one of the neurotrophic factors listed in Dr. Dickie’s post, doesn’t cross the Blood Brain Barrier (BBB). It’s almost impossible to get a therapeutic dose into the patient without an intrathecal infusion (directly into spine) using a pump over time. This has numerous obvious drawbacks. It’s also very unclear whether a single neurotrophic factor is useful in ALS, which encompasses a host of deficiencies.
  3. Cilliary Neurotrophic Factor (CNTF) does cross the BBB and early animal model tests indicated efficacy. However, two human trials in 1996 using subcutaneous delivery and intrathecal delivery as well as a review in 2004 revealed no efficacy in lower doses and serious side-effects at high doses. It’s also important to note that the animal data came well before the excellent work ALSTDI did characterizing the extreme difficulties in using that model. Any ALS mouse data released prior to 2009 (and any subsequent found to not strictly follow those guidelines) should be considered suspect. I have personal knowledge of the difficulty in using this model and the false-positive data which can result from improper use.
  4. Next, Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) also crosses the BBB but has a very very short biological half-life, meaning it is broken down and excreted in a matter of hours. That makes therapeutic levels almost impossible to maintain. A form was created with a buffering agent attached to IGF-1 which roughly doubled the half-life but even that was woefully inadequate. Anyone who remembers the IPLEX debacle of a few years ago knows the story.

The comparisons to such single-target neurotrophic factors as BDNF, CNTF, and IGF-1 are therefore flawed in logic and fact. It is very disingenuous for Dr. Dickie to compare GM6 to them as GM6 is a master regulator and acts in 12 relevant pathways simultaneously. This information is already in the public domain freely available for anyone to look up.

Next, Dr. Dickie compares the GM6 results with those of the initial results of NP001 (actually he links to his own blog post where he addresses the anecdotal reports which came before the official results were published). What he failed to mention was the updated post-hoc analysis which showed a halt of disease progression in 27% of patients in the trial. Further, the analysis showed statistically significant evidence of two biomarkers which identified responding sub-groups. This is a tremendous achievement in ALS clinical trial history. Unfortunately the biomarkers aren’t the same in the GM6 trial so the comparison of the two is incomplete at best. The only real similarity is that both trials used biomarkers as secondary end-points. However, the GM6 trial used them in a way that didn’t require post-hoc analysis.

The comparison with lithium is especially troubling. First, it was far from “recent”, with patient excitement starting in 2007. You can find the data collected in the first PALS-led and created clinical trial which coincidentally also involved lithium. What both ALSA and MNDA failed to report about the study which started the excitement (“Fornai, et al., 2008”) was that the study essentially “cooked the books” by assigning PALS with slow progression of disease to the treatment group while putting the more standard PALS in the placebo group. This was revealed only after the paper was published. In the GM6 trial, run by two leading and internationally well-respected ALS researchers and clinicians, all participants were randomly assigned to receive either drug or placebo. The only way the comparison to the lithium study would be accurate is if the researchers deliberately placed certain patients in each cohort. Genervon merely supplied GM6. The trial was run and data collected by the two principle investigators (fancy name for doctors who run clinical trials). The analysis was then also done by a contract research facility. So any implication that Genervon somehow fabricated the data is false and besmirches the reputations of two prominent ALS doctors.

It must be noted and repeated that the standard FDA clinical trial practice is indeed extremely important in terms of protecting the public from the unscrupulous. The collection of objective scientific data is the foundation of good medical care. Nobody calling for the Accelerated Approval of GM6 disputes this. However, because ALS is so rapidly and uniformly fatal, we are calling for FDA to utilize the discretion it was granted in the face of an earlier similar crisis (the AIDS epidemic). Further, we call on everyone to realize that the GM6 trial used much more than the ALSFRS as a metric and thus smaller trial populations are much more statistically significant than before. The other end-points used in the Phase 2 are objective and not subject to placebo effect. Therefore, the indication of efficacy observed in the trial should be considered stronger than in previous trials which relied almost solely on the ALSFRS.

The Accelerated Approval Program was created to bridge the gap between the need for data and the urgent unmet needs of patients with rapidly-fatal diseases. The GM6 trial was unique in the strength of the preliminary efficacy signal, largely due to the objective biomarker end-points used. Just like the early days AIDS crisis, PALS have no meaningful treatment options and thus no hope. We want to use the very FDA program created to deal with that situation. We admit the need for more scientific data. But we don’t want to die while it’s collected.

/** */

IceBucket The Blue Sky

The #ALSIceBucketChallenge has been nothing short of a miracle for patients and researchers. Internet memes are rather capricious, having a nearly random hit/miss ratio. That this became so huge is a stroke of incredible luck. The awareness, and resulting increase in donations, has been a huge windfall. This surge couldn’t have come at a better time as researchers now have exquisite investigational tools not available even 5 years ago.

There is then the begged question, “Why did it take a patient and a tractor trailer full of luck to bring awareness to the public?” For decades there have been organizations claiming to represent ALS patients. Yet never has there been a sustained national awareness project executed. Patients were left largely on their own to create awareness. This is a question to which we as patients should demand an answer.

Nevertheless, the windfall is upon us. I believe that this boost in funding should be used to create a critical mass of awareness and outreach. As stated, Internet memes are capricious and subject to fading from the public memory with all the speed and ferocity with which it entered. This is the perfect time to keep the message sustained in the public view. Certainly the money to do so is now available.

Another question the ALS patient community should be asking is how much of the massively increased donations are going to be actually used for research, and in what programs. Some donations are going directly to research facilities but the bulk of them are not. Is that bulk to be hoarded and doled out in tiny slices and without focus to a wide variety of basic research projects, never giving any sufficient amounts to fully complete the work? Or will a significant effort be launched which will fund focused work on high-value pathways, including helping fund clinical trials in humans (there are a few promising treatments languishing for lack of funding to pay clinics to conduct Phase 2-3 trials).

This is the time for organizations representing the ALS patient community to step up. The shelf-life of popular public awareness is notoriously short. We need to take this opportunity to create a program of sustained awareness and lobbying for research funding, along with a focused research effort encompassing basic research through to human trials. It is also the time for all research and advocacy organizations to come together as a united front in order to make ALS nothing more than an unpleasant memory.

/** */


On Monday of last week, this excellent PSA was released by Team Gleason. It was shown on the big screens inside the Superdome but needs to be shown repeatedly on major network television (ie ABC/CBS/NBC). Please watch, share with friends, and send to your local network television stations. This is the kind of message that needs to get in front of the eyeballs of America. This is the celebrity action we have been asking for. Now let’s do our part in getting it out there.

/** */

All Alone

It’s the middle of ALS Awareness Month. Individuals have been doing an excellent job of pushing awareness in their local circles. This includes pet groomers holding awareness and fundraising events,


people putting up extensive Pinterest boards,

ALS can affect everyone

and people creating their own video PSAs


in an attempt to reach out to and educate others who aren’t already personally affected by ALS.
I would like to call special attention to my friends at Bed & Biscuits who are doing a local event at their store. Owner Laurie Chadwick and husband moved to Oregon to care for their son Rob after he was diagnosed with ALS. She keeps her business going and does the event mentioned above a few times a year. This is a truly remarkable effort and I hope my readers in the area would take their furry (non-human) children down for a nail trimming to support this event.
There is a lot of action happening by PALS, CALS, and friends. There are even concerned corporate entities trying to make a difference. What is noticeably absent is a national effort by a certain representative organization. This multi-million dollar annual budget organization went to the trouble of creating a rather good PSA featuring Jason Alexander (of “Seinfeld” and other famous work). However, instead of pushing it aggressively on national television, the organization asks those it represents to send around a link via email and social media. This half-baked distribution strategy is clearly unacceptable and example of how the organization works in every area of its operations. This organization can be better, should be better, and we should demand that it be better.
It’s National ALS Awareness Month. Crippled and dying people and their families are exerting considerable energy trying to help themselves. Organizations that collect millions of dollars in donations (approximately half of it from the estimated 30,000 PALS alive during any given year) should be doing more to educate the general public than their individual constituents.

/** */


It’s ALS Awareness Month. As per usual, certain advocacy agencies are content with passive website pages and extolling their constituents to do the heavy lifting of spreading the word (a practice that has dramatic fall-off beyond the tiny individual circles of family and close friends). The agencies bleed enough contributions from the constituency to pay salaries and provide token services (with no consistency between Chapters). Meanwhile, The general public is still unaware and uninformed about the deadly lottery that is ALS.

Up until very recently, ALS was a disease of silence. As Person(s) with ALS (PALS) progressed, they lost their abilities to communicate and mingle in their communities. Very quickly they were shut away in homes or hospitals to die in mute angst with a capable mind trapped in an inert body.

With the advent of social media, as well as the technology of mobile computers with eye-tracking input systems and text-to-speech synthesis, PALS are able to compete on an even footing in cyberspace with more physically capable people. Many of these PALS are in serious medical conditions such as near total paralysis with some on mechanical ventilation via tracheotomy. As the astrophysicist and PALS Stephen Hawking said, “My body may be crippled but my mind is free.” Tech-savvy PALS are able to use combinations of technology to dramatically increase their standard of living, to contribute to research about the disease, and even band together to lobby government to speed up access to promising pharmaceuticals. As wonderfully-explained in a recent forbes.com article, “Technology is the cure” (thanks to Steve Saling for coining that phrase).

On a personal note, technology is saving my life. Many years ago my father was in the US Air Force flying support missions for the Apollo moon flights. On occasion I would be in ARIA control watching technicians tending to walls of huge computers. I thought that was the neatest thing ever. Years later, I was blessed to turn a childhood hobby (began when I commandeered my dad’s IBM PC in 1980) into my career, and I now have in front of me more computing power than all the Apollo vehicles combined.

When I was diagnosed, I knew that my ability to communicate was going to disappear. Knowing that hands-free computer technology existed, and already having a long-term presence in “cyberspace”, I knew that I would be able to be social and productive as my physical ability declined. This was paramount in my decision to accept mechanical ventilation. Without the ability for my mind to escape my physical confinement, I would have years ago allowed myself to succumb to ALS. Instead I have remained active and have had the extraordinary privilege to meet and participate in the global ALS Community.

Unsatisfied with the level of advocacy and awareness generated by organizations with that as their claimed mission, PALS in the global ALS Community are taking it upon themselves to increase awareness and advocacy, and are placing pressure on those representative organizations to change old operating procedures. Other organizations representing other medical conditions are very vocal and aggressive in public awareness (the foundation of funding and national priority for research) and this new group of PALS demand commensurate action from the organizations representing them. The new computer technologies, mobile devices with apps, and ubiquitous connection to the Internet and social media allows PALS to congregate, exchange ideas, and mobilize. No longer are they shut away and forgotten.

This month, are aware or are you just a ware for fundraising that does little?

/** */

Letter From The Void

This letter was written in 2010 by another PALS who has since passed. I didn’t always agree with him about certain things, but on this we most definitely do: ALSA National is letting us down. They have a nonexistent communication campaign unless it is to beg money from PALS (people already under severe financial stress). They have a basic research program that receives a small portion of the budget and no translational program (to move prospective drugs from the lab to the patient). They purport to provide equipment and services yet quietly refer people to other organizations because they “just don’t do that”. PALS may have good experience with their local Chapter (the OT in mine is an absolute superwoman) but there is no consistency between each Chapter.

This letter was written in 2010 and is unfortunately still true. ALSA is failing us.

Ms. Jane Gilbert,
I am writing to you as a 48 year old former airline pilot and victim of ALS, now in my fourth year. The purpose of this communication is to convey my terrible disappointment with the performance of the ALS Association at the national level. In my view, ALSA national is not putting the best interest of the patient community first. The game of baseball provides an excellent visual model of the awareness, advocacy, and research dynamics. Awareness is first base, advocacy is second base, research is third base, and a TRULY effective treatment resides on home base. Sadly, although the game has been playing for decades, the patient community has yet to reach first base. We have no unified national voice and no public awareness program. ALSA seems content to send e-mails to the patient community encouraging the purchase of cheap Chinese bracelets and have this serve as a national awareness program, which it clearly is not. The bedrock of an effective national awareness program is a series of public service announcements airing consistently on national networks. Anything less is a waste of time and resources. Here is what I can see during a typical day of television viewing. See if you can discover a pattern. Quite often on ABC at 6:45pm, I see an excellent PSA from the Alzheimer’s Association, nothing from ALSA. I see KFC commercials for the “pink bucket” of chicken to support breast cancer initiatives, nothing from ALSA. I see PSAs for the breast cancer walk in DC on May 9th, nothing from ALSA. I see the PSA for the MS walk,nothing from ALSA. I see a PSA for the Epilepsy walk, nothing from ALSA. Earlier this year I saw yogurt commercials highlighting the “pink cap” for breast cancer, nothing from ALSA. Do you see the clear pattern that quickly emerges, Ms. Gilbert? Is this disservice to the patient community something to be proud of? ALS continues to be one of the best kept secrets in America because our national organization stubbornly refuses to initiate a consistent program of FREE public service announcements. Can you explain why ALSA refuses to place PSAs on national television? ALS Canada sets a fine example with their public awareness program, that includes an excellent PSA depicting all the phases of ALS in just a few seconds. After their PSA aired for a while, ALS Canada was pleased to notice a large increase in revenue. The PSA system is proven to increase awareness and donations, but it will not work if ALSA refuses to use it at the national level. Considering the bleak prognosis of the patient group, we need the loudest, most radical national organization to push progressive change. Anything less is a disservice to the ALS community. Because there is no national awareness program, and we haven’t reached first base, advocacy is suffering on second base. An effective advocacy program depends upon an effective public awareness program. The public must know the details of ALS in order to support our cause. Likewise for those who control the federal research funds. A new phrase has been circulating on ALS blogs and forums. Anemic Advocacy. The sole use of this new phrase is to describe the advocacy of ALSA at the national level. Last year, we went to the Hill with tin cans to beg for only 5 million dollars from the DOD. This year we are asked to again approach the Hill for only 15 million dollars. While other patient groups demand adequate funding, we are encouraged to move in and sweep up the crumbs. Do you realize that even in 2001, HIV research was supported by 4 billion federal dollars? This year, the Alzheimer’s Association is demanding 2 billion dollars. ALSA acknowledges that 95% of ALS research projects will go unfunded. This would not be the case if ALSA demanded real money instead of pocket change. This year, I will spend my time at the Missing Parts display. I will not carry the can to beg for table scraps. I will however, be willing to climb the Hill to demand not less than 250 million dollars in federal research funding. Swift access to investigational new drugs was a listed legislative priority in 2005 and 2006. Now that important priority is gone, and we still cannot access new drugs. When I asked ALSA for help with obtaining Iplex last summer, there was no interest. Why?I realize that ALSA may not be able to correct the many deficiencies in the research community, so I’ll not dwell long on the third base of the model. Increased funding will help, as will increased communication between all research efforts. A major victory would be achieved if the conventional clinical trial structure were overhauled to reflect the reality of a fast moving condition such as ALS. The process must be simplified and streamlined. When patients don’t live long enough to complete a trial, something is wrong. Just a few more concerns left. I know that a letter was sent to ALSA national some weeks ago asking that all organizations involved in the fight against ALS be welcomed to present at Advocacy Days. The request was denied. As a result, other fine organizations are forced to use the lobby or other hotels. Why is ALSA national so hostile to other organizations that just want to help? We need a unified effort, not political turf wars. What is the issue with signs this year? Last year, my daughter and I carried signs to increase ALS awareness and inform the public of our plight. The signs were very effective and well received at the conference, among the public, and on the Hill. Without signs, you can only bring the message to people next to you, if you still have a voice. You may know that many ALS patients lose their voice, therefor signs are the only means of personal expression and communication. With a sign, I can reach every person within 50′ of my chair. I don’t appreciate being lied to. ALSA seeks to prohibit free speech citing existing regulations prohibiting signs on the hotel property. Quick communication with the JW Marriott reveals that there is no regulation against signs. The element of trust has been damaged. I will once again bring my signs to communicate with the people. I do not wish to cause a disruption and I ask that ALSA not instigate a confrontation by attempting to take my voice away. I notice that the schedule is open on Sunday until 2 pm. Why are our veterans not being honored with a wreath this year?This is a public letter published on ALS forums. I challenge you to take the stage on Monday morning. Many within the ALS patient community will be interested in what you have to say.